I said that I feel compelled to write every day because every day presents an issue that motivates me to do so. I write this blog for free and there are publications that reproduce it without paying me for it and I feel good, because for me there is a way to make a living but to convey ideas. It is obvious that the more people read what I write I feel better, but if anyone would read it as written.
But there are days that I have only one issue, but, and this is what happens to me today.
One thing that strikes me is that at the gala dinner of the President Piñera President Obama invited artists to liven up the act shall be known singers of the left called "The Jaivas" I do not know what to write his name with "v" cut or "vee", as it is called now, when "crab" is written with "b" long.
Why not invite "The Quincheros", sing songs native to the more beautiful and are accompanied by a very traditional and vernacular instrument as the guitar, instead of whistles, charangos, drums and fifes Peru-Bolivian "The crabs?
I will answer: because "The Jaivas" are left, the Concertación, and the current President there is nothing to seduce him but close as possible to the coalition, as I have named his government as "the V "in a cluster.
Had invited to "The Quincheros" I have been very surprised and Barack Hussein Obama, his wife and daughters would have enjoyed much of what they will do.
Other things that caught my attention are some cuts that I saved today, each of which would have merited a separate article, but it went out of fashion:
One, the Chariot judge saying, referring to the murder of Jaime Guzman "The crime being investigated by the impact it causes, can be defined as those against humanity and therefore inalienable."
caused by the impact!
So come our judges. Not as dictated by law ("rule of law") but by the media noise causing events.
Is there any comments? And with a base judgments as unlawful as that, the President denies clemency to "convicted of human rights violations" that occurred in 1973, applying a 2009 law that prohibits the text to be applied to events that preceded it. Is prevailing "the impact of causing" the facts, impact, of course, is artificial and politically provoked.
Two: October 8, 2010 "El Mercurio" published the list of major mining countries of the world, they are 14. Chile, with the increase in royalty provided by the government of Sebastián Piñera and the complacency of the left, will become the country with the tax mining world's highest: 48.8%. In Australia the tax comes to 31.9%. Where large mining companies invested in Chile or Australia? So I have argued that the royalty increase will represent a loss to Chile. To extract a little more to those already here, the country was deprived of all the investment and the taxes themselves could pay and those who do not come to Chile, but will go to another country with lower taxation.
Three: there are dozens of soldiers serving long sentences for killing terrorists FPMR or Lautaro MIR. On October 5, 2010 "El Mercurio" published how come Americans against terrorists (Great critics of the anti-terrorist action Chilean Military Government): "An attack by a U.S. drone in the border region between Pakistan and Afghanistan yesterday killed eight German Islamist militants suspected of planning terrorist attacks in Europe" . Note: "suspects."
Did the U.S. military been prosecuted for these eight crimes against humanity, has released an international arrest warrant against President Barack Obama, Senior of these policies of annihilation and extermination? "Judge Garzon will open a process, at the request of the lawyer Joan Garcés? Certainly not, because when wanted to do on the Franco government as he did on the Pinochet (the latter amid general applause, and in particular, the judges English) Garzon tried him and he was suspended from his duties while he prepares sentence trampling by size amistía law and prescription.
By the way, in the same newspaper reported that Fahd Mohammad al Quso, a member of Al Qaeda, was "taken prisoner and brought before a court? No, of course, but who was killed by U.S. missile in Pakistan. There
Chilean officers serving life imprisonment for killing eight terrorists of the FPMR. And dozens more have proceeded as against other extremists. There is a fiscal Chilean prison in Italy for having issued proceedings against a terrorist convicted of Italian descent in 1973. Having applied the law! (That tax had nothing to do with the subsequent disappearance of convicted). Why
here all this was an "egregious violation of human rights" and there is a meritorious action to protect a civilized country against terrorism? Who knows.
In his autobiography, former President Bush explains the legal and moral foundation that allowed him that tough (including forms of torture, he says, helped save thousands of American lives.) Obama has continued in that tradition.
All his arguments in defense of the action apply U.S. anti-terrorism action Chilean military government. But hardly anyone in the world is willing to condemn the United States government for exactly the same reasons is condemned, taunts, insults and discredits the government who saved Chile from falling under the sway of what Ronald Reagan so aptly called "Evil Empire."
0 comments:
Post a Comment