The French have discovered that they are very powerful. In Chile, this time a powerful "false clear" is that six months postnatal is a breakthrough. Everybody seems to think so. to employers, which may cover better than the rest of the people the true extent of political demagoguery.
should make us think the fact that both countries richer than ours, and in 25 of the European Union, the postnatal is, on average, 5.1 weeks and not 24.
Few have said that most Chilean women do not have six months postnatal. In fact, do not even have postnatal, because that majority has no work contract. And the minority who will receive it is not that of the poorest women. In other words, the poorest children themselves may have a breast of six months, but because their mothers have no jobs and are at home or just do odd jobs.
Legislation demagogic not really aimed at helping poor women would be to give postnatal care to those without it.
Entrepreneurs postnatal care little about six months because the state pays. And they believe will reduce the extra licenses are now asking the women to contract. I think not going to decline, but will add to them. If a woman becomes pregnant and have a contract, shall enjoy prenatal and postnatal care, which add up to seven and a half months, which will earn income without working (paid by the state: that is the license), then can use the license to attend to the sick child under one year, and we know that a greater or lesser extent, all the babies get sick, and if you previously obtained licenses for other health reasons, now have another reason, the "post-lactation stress." The times they are added to previous ones in that they could draw a salary without working. And if we add their holiday entitlement in each year who have a child may spend ten months without working and getting paid.
All this is going to pay the state. If you read "El Mercurio" today, Economic Issues section, A2, will the Minister of Finance has given up its goal of balancing the budget at the end of this government has already acknowledged it will not, and has to deal with the request another "bonus in March, has to finance the candidate's promise to abolish the levy Piñera health for retirees (who are not among the poorest in society) and should join the newly announced ethics income family that will also budget.
But as there is for sure that the inflation target will overwhelmed and prices will rise five percent this year, the Central Bank will surely start to go higher interest rates, which will bring a contractionary pressure and, therefore, a tendency to higher unemployment.
should be noted that another idea that has caught a lot in the media, and is not false, is that many jobs were created in 2010 and the unemployment rate coming down, but something does not appear in the media is that , along with that, the number of unemployed increased in 2010. And, according to the latest figures, unemployment also began to rise, as has been released this week. And more so the number increased again unemployed.
Summary: postnatal six months does not improve the situation of most women; tsmpoco helps the poorest women, as they are unemployed, and helps to create more public spending in a period when inflation is increasing and Therefore, what would be required to moderate spending.
So those reasons may explain why the Minister of Finance does not appear at celebrations or statements of support for the six months postnatal.
0 comments:
Post a Comment