The country is so mired in an atmosphere of platitudes and slogans in the public debate that has lost all sense of critical or analytical.
There is much discussion about whether or not to be included in a pardon to a sick old general who is in prison and all, starting with the judge who sentenced him know he is innocent of the facts against him, apart from countless other legal reasons under a real rule of law would prevent it were arrested. Yes, believe me, the judge knows that, moreover, is innocent, but the judge carried out a vengeance policy. So he was sentenced. Is that the general led the NCI (long after the acts for which he has been convicted and without even leftist judges have found a way to prosecute him for his performance in the CNI). And you know that the CNI is politically outlawed. So the minister dismissed Allamand advisers to its portfolio if it even worked a few months to the CNI.
But at the same time, how is not going to pardon the general? If you are not pardoned him, old, sick, innocent to whom you can then pardon? No one would be the logical conclusion. But the level of internal debate is so poor, so miserable, so below the logic elementary, the government and the Opposition agree to the streets to nearly ten thousand common criminals through a pardon, but do not want to appear giving it to a general (r) octogenarian, sick and innocent. That is the country in which we live. At this level decisions are made.
The president does not want the general pardon, can he, in and of itself, it perfectly. But he denied clemency just assumed. Because in the miserable level of our public debate that usually is "a violator of human rights." Which is not because he has never been tested if any hit. But of course the President can not just like that, now, going back to refuse when is to launch into the street to thousands of common criminals.
So infinitely always handy, "he passes the hot potato" to Congress. That Congress denied it, which certainly will. And get rid of the problem.
Another miserable misery of this debate is that 60 or 65 uniformed prisoners (even they know the exact number) are people who before becoming involved in the fight against twenty thousand terrorists armed left (ten thousand locations, recognized by Altamirano , and ten thousand foreigners, certified by the OAS), were exemplary citizens. And after his act on the intelligence services as well. Citizens are decent and law-abiding, that during a period had to fight terrorists. And many of them are in jail without ever having committed atrocities against its own leftist terrorists. That's what everybody knows. What happens is that those who know what they are innocent even that did not want to reveal today.
All this happens because there is a group related to left-wing terrorism that is capable of throwing bombs, carry out attacks, taking to the streets and destroying public and private property, and also has long arms (just in case ", as he confessed once your boss). It is the fear of terrorist violence that pervades equally the Government and Congress, with the exception of its members identified with these terrorists, who are a half dozen, and course, have no fear, because the nature of their mission is unfounded to others and achieve all proposed and received at the palace and invited to international tours.
That's the miserable poor level of current internal debate, amid slogans, hypocrisy, fear and lies. The result is quite predictable: they will release thousands of criminals to return to his customary occupation, and a pardon, and they're going to deny a gentleman who is not a danger to society, but only a living testimony injustice, illegality, lack of compassion and absurdity that runs public life in the country of the commonplace, the rant left, your right brain dead and perfect and methodically washes.
0 comments:
Post a Comment