A Debate
There multiplicity of views about the possibility of generating electricity by nuclear power plants in a seismic country like ours. But it's a pointless debate, because it appeared a document signed in 2006 by the current President of the Republic, in which he undertakes to oppose nuclear power plants.
Then, as happened in the case of thermoelectric Barrancones, who was not only urgently needed but had environmental permits for construction and approval of government authorities, the emergence of evidence of a commitment the current president's campaign, objecting to its construction, was enough for him, passing on the technical, environmental decisions and the needs of medium-term economic growth, rescind the authorization of that exchange.
Minister of Energy, Laurence Golborne, but has said that during the current government will not build any nuclear power plants, said to be advanced in studies of its necessity and convenience. But now, with the appearance of the document that Sebastian Pinera promised in 2006 to oppose such power, his government can not even afford to do preliminary studies on the matter. Well, just because the President would order them and in default of an explicit promise made to the public. If you object to there being that kind of generation, should object to study the possibility of it.
The mayor of La Pergola de las Flores "sang:" Everybody say yes, and then do what suits me more. "A politician par excellence. To win votes that is usually a good recipe. But if he has also promised high economic growth and social welfare, along with promises not to build power plants and explore other best alternative more efficient future generation such as nuclear, one of the two promises - to oppose the plants or have high growth - remain unanswered.
presidential signature on the 2006 document prevents it, then , the Minister Golborne even consider the point.
If after four years comes another government led by someone "he has said yes to everyone" (Someone who may well be, according to polls, chaired by Laurence Golborne), only then may make the necessary studies and probably conclude that the cheapest energy, clean and safe, even in a seismic country, is produced by nuclear power generation. Then everyone will recognize that four years will be lost.
is the nature of social prejudice demagoguery representing the welfare of peoples.
0 comments:
Post a Comment